correction: this seems to have happened during this period but not right when he says it did. During the Clinton campaign they swapped back and forth, and by Bush II they were fixed Rep-red, Dem-blue
given that the Democrats are primarily in control of the various media companies, it was their choice to make. Previous to this, contrary to what was said, blue was not consistently the Republican color, it seems like it was inconsistent
-
-
also, this guy blocked me for telling the truth, I suppose it would ruin his propaganda?pic.twitter.com/sHfNAlk32u
-
This is pops, you affirmed his timeline, but think you did something else. You'd need to show examples of when tv goes color to pre-Reagan and those examples would prove one of you correct.
-
don't really care to, to be honest. But if you want to you can research it yourself. I'm simply relating my anecdote on the subject, which contradicts his claim.
-
It wasn't an anecdote and it didn't contradict his claims. Your information showed the part of his statement related to the information provided by you, to be true.
-
It was an anecdote and it did contradict his claim.
-
This isn't an anecdote.https://twitter.com/gtaogle/status/1047570885224386560 …
-
It is. My claim is that I observed 1. colors switching during the Clinton campaigns (1992,1996) 2. colors only becoming fixed in the Bush II campaign (2000) Since it's pretty obvious what I'm saying, I'm going ask you directly: why are you misrepresenting me?
-
Guess what time periods above are post-Reagan? He said Pre and during Reagan,Red for Dem and blue for Rep. He said post Reagan, change occurred. You show changes occurring post Reagan and the change becoming permanent with W. This is why I said info from 58-80 would prove.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
