Do tell.
No, I agree with the poets here, being a poet. They are about producing good spectacles (scenes of violence and so forth) and intriguing and bracing speeches - Hamlet is known for its speeches, not for anyone understanding what happened 
-
-
here is the link to Rymer's work, anyway. It's worth reading and consideringhttps://books.google.com/books?id=AN4iAAAAMAAJ&pg=PP8#v=onepage&q&f=false …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't agree at all. Hamlet is layered: Medieval, Renaissance, Elizabethan, modern, even existential. It is astonishing. The more you read and the deeper you go the more this play yields. It is the Great Play of the western canon.
-
I spent years pondering whether Hamlet or King Lear is the greater play. I settled finally on Lear, but I haven't read either of them recently (in a decade), so perhaps I'm older and wiser. I'm at least older.
-
They are both magisterial plays of the western canon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
