Something that has happened is always an object of faith. There is no unmediated, direct access to 'facts'--even immediate sense perception doesnt deliver facts apart from a faith that your senses map onto an objective exterior reality (something unprovable).
-
-
Of course it is.
-
it's not. People wake up in the morning in the exterior world, needing no claim (metaphysical or otherwise) that the world in which they exist, exists. It simply is. You can doubt its existence, but this is generally a form of academic skepticism.
-
Yhere is no way whatever world you wake up in corresponds to the world others inhabit, or that you are not the only conscious mind within it etc. I agree that *in reality* people do wake up and are in the world that just is, because their mode of being is a natural faith..
-
Incorrect, although I can imagine that humans which were raised outside of contact of another human being might genuinely have this issue. You spend the first 9 months of your life INSIDE another human, if this is not "the same world", what is
-
I just said it is that world. I am asking how someone who denies the necessity of faith for knowing can establish that, given that the experience of being inside a human could be a deception (or that you could be the first human born with conscious experience, rest automotons).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
