Friedman isn't being especially perspicacious here; free immigration plus welfare means you will attract those most in need, that is, those who take more than they give, from across the world. Individual cases may vary, but the incentive is thus. https://twitter.com/Static_Rage/status/1044918917884514304 …
these claimed numbers about immigrants improving things are generally based on a rather strict policy, a policy designed to ensure that on average those immigrants allowed in give back more than they take, which should more than offset for refugees and so on. It's a tautology.
-
-
This is an evergreen problem for marketing: you get the ROI numbers up, which is great, but then when you scale out the quality necessarily plummets. Often consultants do not mention that increasing spend will drop the quality of the dollars spent, and % ROI.
Show this thread -
this is just to say arguing for immigration based on the quality of past immigrants has a reflexivity problem. You can certainly argue to continue a certain immigration policy based on the results, but expanding it must necessarily change those numbers.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
