Conversation

France has 67.4M people. India has 1.38B people. But France has a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, and India does not. So why do people claim the world order is "democratic"?
934
3,388
18.8K
Throughout history, power has been held by those who make their own weapons, fight and win wars, and who can stare down peers with threat of brute force and who hold economic leverage. Two facts: the world has never been democratic and incumbents never seek to share power.
5
121
1,039
India will force its way to the table in the next 15 years. By then, it’ll be a $10T economy with an indigenized military that forces the Chinese (and Americans) into accommodation. Or simply, a new UN of sorts will get formed down the line, where India leads the global south.
28
49
488
Replying to and
Perhaps the least cerebral comment I’ve come across on this platform. The big defining ideological question - to side with a criminal syndicate operating out of DC or an autocratic regime in Moscow. Given that’s the sole point on which the comment was made, I have nothing to say.
3
13
168
keep up with the central issue of our time "Pakistan Bad", I'm sure superpower status is right around the corner
9
1
32
Show replies
Replying to and
“Never taken a side on big defining ideological questions.” 🙄🙄🙄 It’s not a perfect country but my old passport from when India was a poorer place tells me India had the moral courage to disallow travel to apartheid South Africa. Wealthier countries lacked that political will.
1
1
11
Show replies
The simplest of question is: Why India must choose sides? Why is it difficult for the western world to digest that India has a side of its own which is governed by the ethos of a civilization 1000s of years old, actually older than any other civilization existing on planet today.
1
5
Show replies