"rounding them up" isn't the move, but as people have mental episodes in public and refuse treatment I do think involuntary commitment to a state institution makes sense. This, paired with prosecution of public camping and drug laws.
That means sending most of them to prisons, work camps, asylums, addiction treatment centres, right? At least for the places that are really far gone like vancouver
I say rounding them up because that’s what the opponents will say. It’s involuntary, against western norms
There's an option other than prisons, which is basically saying you can't camp here and throwing their stuff away. Which sucks, but making homelessness unsustainable is what forces people to take a hard exit from it, and removes SF from the list of safe havens for drug addicts.