Conversation

When they surrender, they need to be held in strategic buildings such as communications centers, food stores, ammunition stores, hospitals etc which the Russians have seem to be targeting with bombs and artillery fire - and make that known to the Russian military.
56
27
274
Article 23, 1st paragraph, of the 1949 Geneva Convention III: No prisoner of war may at any time be sent to, or detained in areas where he may be exposed to the fire of the combat zone, nor may his presence be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operation
3
15
It would certainly be illegal to house them in ammunition stores. Comm. centers can be legit military targets. The larger point is that it is illegal to use POWs as human shields. ("nor may his presence be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operation.")
2
4
I understand why it sounds fair to put the Russian POWs places the Russians shouldn't be attacking anyway. If Ukraine broke the Geneva convention, they would still be guilty, even if the Russians were more guilty. It wouldn't stop the Russians from targeting these areas, anyway.
3
1
I think you can get away with putting them in hospitals. You're right that ammunition stores would be a clear violation but a hospital for shielding is a bit gray and in the grand scheme of things there's no chance it would be prosecuted.
1
4
I'm sure it wouldn't, but the point isn't to see what you can get away with. War is dirty enough without deliberate and purposeless dishonor. Russia does not care if it hits Russian POWs. This whole discussion is about ethical/legal compromise for something that gains nothing.
1
2