Perhaps next time try RLWE/RLWR algorithms (e.g. Kyber, Saber, Round5). One would expect handshake to be at least twice as fast as HRSS in ephemeral-key setting (NTRU key generation is a real bottleneck). Message sizes are comparable or smaller.
-
-
-
Actually, as stated in the post, we found that x25519 was the real bottleneck for perf.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Also, check out
@agl__'s excellent write-up of the client-side of the experiment. Not the nail in the coffin for SIKE, but it likely rules it out for use in HTTPS. https://www.imperialviolet.org/2019/10/30/pqsivssl.html …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
> small and slow What about penguins on land instead of turkeys?


-
Penguins are super slick, small, slow, and live by the ocean. Maybe we use them for CSIDH?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Typo at the beginning of Discussion: “We found that CECPQ2 (the ostrich) outperformed CECPQ2 (the turkey)…” (no differentiation, PQ2b).
-
Thanks, fixed!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
When I saw the attached image, I thought this was part a new feature of unicode combining emojis.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It's been a blast working on this project with
@grittygrease@agl__@lukevalenta Krzysztof Kwiatkowski and Alan Mislove. Amazing effort by Cloudflare and Google; I'm just happy to get to explore (and try to make sense of) some of these strange results!Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
How many qubits do we need to break it? Are 54 enough?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.