Remdesivir was developed in 2014 in response to Ebola, per official records. It did not have benefits in Ebola. It has sat unapproved for any indication for 6 years. Remdesivir is a “treatment” that lacks a disease to treat. Please be skeptical of pharmaceutical press releases.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @lemur_katta1
Fauci using the word “promising” shouldn’t replace appropriate interpretation of data. He didn’t say it’s the answer.
2 replies 2 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @RyanMarino @lemur_katta1
GrepMed Retweeted NBC News
he pretty much declared it the new standard of care...https://twitter.com/nbcnews/status/1255546344879595520?s=21 …
GrepMed added,
5:01NBC NewsVerified account @NBCNewsDr. Fauci on the clinical trial for potential coronavirus treatment drug remdesivir: “[The study data] shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery;” says remdesivir improved recovery time from 15 days to 11 days. pic.twitter.com/1WNCO3c5hI3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
You know what Tamiflu is right? It shortens your recovery period —especially if you take it closer to onset of symptoms—by two maybe three days Your doctor will also tell you it’s probably not worth taking because it’s $100+ and doesn’t actually cure you, just a treatment js
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
2-3d? it's actually closer to 16 hours of benefit, plus GI side effects..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I was being as generous as I could guess - my experience was as you described
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nice evidence breakdown herehttps://first10em.com/tamiflu-doesnt-work/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.