A new 2300 word peer review of the Stanford paper. I'm glad they did a serosurvey but am skeptical of the conclusion because: - test may have high false positive rate - sample may be enriched for COVID-19 - study implies faster spread than past pandemicshttps://medium.com/@balajis/peer-review-of-covid-19-antibody-seroprevalence-in-santa-clara-county-california-1f6382258c25 …
-
-
Eh not really. NYC had overwhelmed hospitals. We would expect the death rate to be higher there.
-
Isn't the fatality rate with overwhelmed hospitals the important number to consider for policy? Besides which, many more will die in NYC, and no where close to 100% have been infected, so the fatality rate is clearly far higher.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.