Conversation

Gregg Gonsalves
@gregggonsalves
What is amusing to me is that
@MartinKulldorff
chided me for dragging politics into what he would like to call a scientific debate. Then he's taking tea with
@SWAtlasHoover
,
@SecAzar
, @RonDeSantisFL and hanging out at right/libertarian think-tanks like
@aier
. 1/
Quote Tweet
Joshua Silver
@eyejosh
Replying to @gregggonsalves
It does sound as though our three scientific colleagues here are possibly allowing themselves to be manipulated by politics. We heard much the same sort of dangerous twaddle just today from Trump - is this merely coincidence, or is there some “behind the scenes” coordination ?
10
Retweets
33
Likes
1
Bookmark
Gregg Gonsalves
@gregggonsalves
And I'd point people to
@BillHanage
's thread: if you want to know the state of the scientific debate, list the experts in the field and ask. Don't cherry-pick a few that confirm your personal biases, because that is playing politics with science. end/
Quote Tweet
Bill Hanage
@BillHanage
Scientists are not "divided". If you want to know what scientists really think, ask them and interpret the results scientifically 1/n spectator.co.uk/article/with-s
Show this thread
22
Sacha Gilbert
@SachaGilbert
Weren’t one (or two?) of these docs on Laura Ingram’s “Medicine Cabinet” segment the other night? All those evening shows on Fox are targeted to an audience of one. It’s wild. They say it then he tweets it.
Lazarus Long
@LazarusLong13
I like to refer to them as Herdologists, and Martin as Cull-dorff. I know some news folks are digging deep into their relationship with Neeleman.
1