Second, data on asymptomatic spread emerged slowly and early evidence was equivocal. Again, advice to flatten the curve and social distance was agnostic to that fact. We didn’t tell just the sick to break the chain but for everyone to social distance. 2/
-
-
-
And as one of the other replies to your inane tweet points out the public health guidance has been similar across countries; it’s implementation and commitment they makes the US, Brazil outliers. 3/
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Really? It’s a debacle when scientists take the evidence they have, use it to prioritise scarce resources, and then as the evidence changes, they move with it? That’s a debacle?
- Show replies
-
-
-
He's the guy who wrote that relocating NIH to Cleveland would be "easy" so this dumb tweet is very on brand for him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beautiful well thought out response to original ridiculous post. It’s just willful ignorance or laziness to not have heard the advice given. And the muzzling of government experts is not the government experts fault ffs. That’s leadership driven.
-
My memory of advice given is docs confidently proclaiming masks don't work, to the point where mask *wearing* was mocked as much as we mock lunatic anti mask people now
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How in the world was supression an option when we couldn’t even adequately test for weeks?
-
Shut downs were the only way
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.