9/ Of course, companies can (and should) certainly set out to capture more voice/images and progress NLP research
Conversation
10/ This of course doesn't apply to some industries that DO rely heavily on images (e.g. radiology). But today that's a smallish subset
1
20
11/ RPA is NOT AI. It's fragile, hard to deploy, rules-based process automation tech based on GUI-level integration. More on this later...
3
4
21
12/ Most execs have very little understanding of how to "apply AI" today
5
11
42
12/ This is unsurprising: they are caught between the tech industry's "magic cognitive AI does everything" hype marketing...
2
3
32
13/... and of course not having the technical understanding to identify labeled datasets/decisioning opportunities for supervised learning
3
1
37
14/ AI-enabled consumer products are making much, much faster progress so far, delivering new UX to consumers who are voice and photo-first
3
3
40
15/ I'm optimistic we can do much better than this over the next few years as we get to the slightly less obvious ideas...
1
1
19
16/... and there is more crossover between people who understand domain problems, workflow, modern ML and product
3
1
33
17/ End musings! Side note: check out 's HBR article on what AI can and can't do right now: hbr.org/2016/11/what-a
6
17
85
This is exactly how the role of a data scientist in the enterprise should bridge between the applications the data and the algorithms