Thom and Dieudonne kept their lunacy on the sly. Mandelbrot threw books at people. Grothendieck's /Recoltes et Semailles/ is a strange read. That Mandelbrot is the least weird of them is tricky to digest.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
I've been trying to keep my exposure to philosophers of mathematics as tiny as possible.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @thomasmurphy__
There's weird swirly stuff with patterns in motion which tends to subvert the kind of mereotopologies philosophical Think-o-Persons tend to start doorstop books "My new Reality-o-System..." with
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @graveolens @thomasmurphy__
(I am being unfair. But I sort of want to pay attention to where pattern gets weird and that's part of the motivation for spending time on chainmail lattices: they might not be realizable atomically, but they're a lot less slippery than point lattices)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @graveolens @thomasmurphy__
results from October: http://owen.maresh.info/cmhp.html I can talk ears off about this. The models
@ikefeitler printed tend to derail attention so I have to be judicious about their use. I have yet to make it to Catalan solid skeleta.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I've been thinking about the monomers as Riemann surfaces. In states where they can't move - maximal tension or compression, I'm assuming that vibration will be zero, and then using that as a boundary condition.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
the chainmail lattices keep me honest, well, they're more constrained than point lattices.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.