functions x(t), y(t), and z(t) associated with the Lorenz attractor. /their interesting properties are difficult to work directly/ merits qualification.
why is it that we only have the Lerch and Painleve transcendents? What qualifies a function as /being a 'transcendent'? Not all specfuns seem to have /transcendent/ stick. We usually don't regard, say "automorphic L-functions" as transcendents or the
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.