why do copyright strikes affect the standing of your channel? You are putting creators at the direct mercy of claiming companies, it's stupid. If I get a copyright STRIKE, fine you can take the video down, but to penalize someone's channel as a whole? Please explain @TeamYouTube
-
Show this thread
-
There is no logic in this whatsoever. Anyone with malicious intent and a claiming tool could terminate pretty much any big YouTuber's channel. Understand: If you have 3 (three) videos on your channel that contain any copyrighted content in them whatsoever, you are at risk of...
2 replies 6 retweets 123 likesShow this thread -
...losing your channel. Copyright strikes and TOS strikes are two completely separate issues and grouping them together is utterly nonsensical
@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube1 reply 6 retweets 149 likesShow this thread -
If I wanted to, I could put a STRIKE (yes a STRIKE) on
@PewDiePie's channel. He's used my Auctioneer Beats content before in his videos. You need 3 (three) of these to terminate (TERMINATE) someone's channel. Fix your backwards system and protect your creators@TeamYouTube5 replies 9 retweets 161 likesShow this thread -
Unfortunately this is because of DMCA law which forces platforms to penalize and ban repeat infringers
4 replies 2 retweets 50 likes -
Do you have the documentation that sites this
1 reply 0 retweets 37 likes -
The DMCA law has a repeat infringer policy, I don't have the exact text of the law but if you google "DMCA repeat infringer policy" you'll get a lot of articles about it.
2 replies 1 retweet 53 likes -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright_Infringement_Liability_Limitation_Act … Nowhere in law documentation does it state the number of times a ISP / platform has to decide on 3 strikes. Through everywhere I looked, it isn't defined anywhere and is up to the discretion of the platform. Why not make the limit 10 strikes?pic.twitter.com/NEwLDUVEyB
1 reply 0 retweets 25 likes -
Oh yeah it leaves it up to the platforms to come up with a "fair" policy. Still, whether it's 3 or 10 strikes, it has to be there. Platforms probably try to go with a smaller number to make sure they're on the safe side.
2 replies 0 retweets 34 likes -
Protecting creators = increasing the strike limit. If YouTube hasn't already made a case to do this, then my original tweet stands
1 reply 0 retweets 32 likes
Sure, except according to the giant entertainment corporations it will mean "protecting copyright infringers", and will make YouTube more at risk of getting sued by them for billions.
-
-
YouTube generates the majority of these label's revenue, from music videos to streaming. YouTube video views are becoming the industry standard to measure success. They have a strong case to take back control from these oppressive companies, I think they should take it to court
2 replies 3 retweets 70 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @grandayy @CowbellyTV and
You both are correct, so maybe 5 strikes is better for everyone. And seperated copyright and ToS strikes.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.