you might want to read the piece before replying?
-
Novi razgovor
-
-
-
I'm disappointed that a lot of people seem to have decided that fancy pattern-matching is "artificial intelligence".
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I am able to generate some impressive looking tax returns, but anything that looks like genuine understanding is just an illusion.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Would’ve been good to reference the recent FB network that solves differential equations. Possibly, with domain specific data (for logic, algebra, location inference etc.) the network can learn these concepts too as thought vectors. We need to go from v0.1 to v1.0 of Empiricism.
-
please read Ernie Davis’s arXiv reply, which i have posted here repeatedly
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
What would a system which exhibited "genuine understanding" look like? How would we know one when we saw one?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You don't give BS enough credit. Blather is ubiquitous. Fluent nonsense and tangents reflect a dearth of knowledge, not an illusion of language or understanding. GPT-2 systems mimic the reality of speech. They remind me of answers from an unprepared student.
@amazonramblerHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.