Predictably, some in the media breathlessly report on this non-peer reviewed model, built on incredibly faulty assumptions that do not reflect the actual facts and data. (2/)
Deze collectie tonen
This report isn't science. It's fiction. Under the guise of academic research, it's nothing short of an attack on those who exercised their personal freedom to attend Sturgis. (THREAD 1/)https://twitter.com/FriedsonAndrew/status/1302591878957862912 …
-
-
-
At one point, academic modeling also told us that South Dakota would have 10,000 COVID patients in the hospital at our peak. Today, we have less than 70. I look forward to good journalists, credible academics, and honest citizens repudiating this nonsense. (3/3)
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Drag them Queen!
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
-
It’s a conspiracy? Against freedom? Good God. What the hell is wrong with you?
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Well, you have to say this because otherwise, you'd probably have to take responsibility for abdicating any semblance of leadership, leading to the inescapable conclusion that your gross negligence is going to ruin or end countless lives. You are truly a coward and a disgrace.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Math debunked this one fairly quickly.https://twitter.com/HeckofaLiberal/status/1303383015922384896 …
-
Sturgis happened how long ago? Timeline may not add up yet.
- Antwoorden weergeven
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.