Some voters ask what I would do about "big tech censorship" if elected governor The question falsely assumes there is such a thing You don't have a 1st Amendment right to spew nonsense on a corporation's website. If you sue Twitter for banning you, you will lose.https://twitter.com/AriCohn/status/1432386313806823428 …
-
Pruneyard, at least at this time, only applies to petition gathering. If it were to come up today, the SC would almost certainly reverse.
Pruneyard protects expressive activity other than petition gathering - which I know from having litigated cases involving anti-puppy store protesters - but it does not apply to places other than shopping malls. It's never been held to apply to the internet.
-
-
Also, the special Pruneyard right to protest on private property (shopping malls) only applies in California. Pruneyard held California's Constitution provides broader free speech rights than the 1st amendment. Still only applies at shopping malls though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.