just learned about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal … im fucking awed that this guy published 15 first author papers in science and nature in the span of 2 years before people caught on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal#Withdrawn_journal_articles …
one thing I worry about a lot is that it seems like the only instances in which data falsification is actually detected is when people commit fraud in obvious/sloppy ways ie this guy just rescaling the same data for different figures https://media-bell-labs-com.s3.amazonaws.com/pages/20170403_1709/misconduct-revew-report-lucent.pdf …pic.twitter.com/MhbnrgBfvo
-
-
would this guy have ever been caught if he had bothered to use a random number generator while making up his data? or would he have ended up with some cushy faculty job and just gotten some side-eye about having results that were 'difficult to reproduce'
-
oh my god is anything real
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.