Also, @ThisMomHCN's citing the Mawson study, which, scientifically speaking, was a piece of crap that had been gestating for years and spotted around. 2/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/05/08/a-horrendously-bad-vaxedunvaxed-study-rises-from-the-dead-yet-again/ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
It's so bad that even a bottom-feeding pay-to-publish journal retracted it. 3/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/05/10/the-mawson-vaxedunvaxed-study-retraction-the-antivaccine-movement-reacts-with-tears-of-unfathomable-sadness/ …
Show this thread -
Then, the check must have cleared, and Mawson got his dreck back online. 4/https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/05/18/the-check-must-have-finally-cleared-or-mawsons-incompetent-vaxedunvaxed-study-is-back-online/ …
Show this thread -
Such is the "quality" of evidence used by antivaxers—none. 5/5
Show this thread -
Oops. I also forgot that
@ThisMomHCN is a piece of work, referring to cancer patients as though the term were an insult. 5a/5 https://twitter.com/thismomhcn/status/997283911502675968 …This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.