Well, yes. I just meant that in the rhetoric of CAM it stands in for those (withholding judgment about the efficacy or sincerity of that rhetoric).
-
-
Well, it’s still quite limited data for the conclusion you drew. Whatever my comment may be about the “tone” the lay public hears from scientists generally, and the response that creates, you should have your own standard, one that is fit for a serious scientist.
-
Please spare me the "fit for a serious scientist" bit. I reject whatever behavioral and speech parameters to which you think I should constrain myself. I choose my own parameters as I see fit, just as you do.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Let’s try that again
“I have published extensively on this topic. If you are interested, I can share.”