Here, a quack naturopath (but I repeat myself) peddles the common cancer quack lie that chemotherapy doesn't work. 1/ https://twitter.com/drpeterglidden/status/979845941271449600 …
-
-
The 2% gambit relies on confusing adjuvant chemo therapy work curative intent chemotherapy AND leaving out of the analysis all the cancers for which chemotherapy is most effective. 3/
Show this thread -
In fact, chemotherapy has contributed significantly to cancer survival, regardless of what quacks like @drpeterglidden claim. 4/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chemotherapy-doesnt-work-not-so-fast-a-lesson-from-history/ …
Show this thread -
Moreover, as unpleasant and toxic as some chemotherapy can be, death from cancer is worse. 5/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chemotherapy-versus-death-from-cancer/ …
Show this thread -
Of course, telling people that chemotherapy is dangerous and doesn't work, that "chemo is for losers" is what naturopathic quacks like @drpeterglidden do. 6/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/chemotherapy-is-for-losers-a-tragic-tale-of-cancer-naturopathic-quackery-and-murder/ …
Show this thread -
As a cancer surgeon, I get infuriated when I see cancer quacks like @drpeterglidden deceiving cancer patients into not undergoing the chemotherapy they need. 7/7
Show this thread -
ADDENDUM to my Tweetstorm: Oh, dear. It appears that @drpeterglidden was unhappy about being called out over his cancer quackery.


pic.twitter.com/zjEJODXMrB
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ND Not Doctor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No question chemotherapy extends survival, but what fraction of metastatic cancer patients who receive chemotherapy are cured (whether or not they get surgery/radiation)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.