Notice how the "literature dump" really is a dump, but more in the sense that I think of sitting on the toilet to be taking a dump. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
Look at the titles: Bechamps, whose idea that microbes don't really cause disease but are manifestations of diseased tissues lost out to Pasteur 150+ years ago. 3/
Show this thread -
Then there's the rogues' gallery of antivaxers whose pseudoscience I've been refuting for >13 years: David Kirby, Neil Miller, the late Mayer Eisenstein, Leonard Horowitz, Viera Scheibner, etc. 4/
Show this thread -
The photo at the start of this thread really does sum up the antivaccine understanding of science. Antivaxers think that large quantities of crap science trump many decades of real science supporting the safety and efficacy of vaccines. 5/5
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder how many flatbed trucks you'd need for all the papers on vaccine safety taking the consensus view? "Vaccine" in PubMed returns 300,000 hits.
-
New conversation -
-
-
How are those books are called "research"? As if they don't know what research actually is. Oh, wait...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.