I would go further than that, and say that we physicians have a responsibility to refute inaccurate information, pseudoscience, and quackery online. That's kinda my thing, and has been for close to 20 years now going back to Usenet.https://twitter.com/drmlb/status/967128211309154304 …
-
-
MOC has no scientific evidence for its requirement. I am refuting its requirement to practice medicine. Anything that supports its requirement is inaccurate. I am standing up against it. It is Crock. And anything that requires a unscientific program to practice med needs to stop
-
Last yr she equated ending MOC with being a pilot who had never flown. Grossly inaccurate & misleading.pic.twitter.com/42TzOgqfNr
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The non sequitor is that MOC is connected to my practice of medicine but should not be
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny bur luckily you don't live/work with me. Everything is related to the MOC. 2 degrees of separation! Lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.