My article in @UpshotNYT has now triggered a coordinated group of people to emailing me and the editorial board very upset that I said that some people consider the prevention of implantation by a fertilized embryo to be abortion.
-
-
Still silence in response to
@DrJenGunter, yet@lymanstoneky found time to respond to all those others. What is the problem with being corrected by an actual expert? cognitive dissonance? Or just the run of the mill cowardice of an ideologue faced with contrary facts? -
We don't discuss climatology by referencing the flat earth beliefs of climate denialists with equal weight We don't pepper evolutionary science with the counterfactual claims from the ID institute. Why is it ok to introduce the counterfactual narrative here?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.