#TheResident our next new episode on feb 26 pulls back the curtain on multiple surgeries. Ask your surgeon if he or she could be running, legally, up to 4 ORs at once.https://youtu.be/PwJbqW8HYyk
-
-
Replying to @aholdenj
I’ve worked as a med student, resident, and attending in nine hospitals from academic centers to small community hospitals and I’ve NEVER seen this. Stop hiding BS with ‘patient advocacy’.
3 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @adandersen @aholdenj
Indeed. In most hospitals it's like pulling teeth to get a second room so that a surgeon doesn't have to wait for his room to turn over to start another case and can be more efficient.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @adandersen
Do some research. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/is-your-surgeon-double-booked/2017/07/10/64a753f0-3a7d-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.d776c1cf8438 …https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/should-a-surgeon-run-two-operations-at-once-595477571660 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @aholdenj @adandersen
Ah, but your show is not about double booking, is it? It's about triple and quadruple booking. Now that I've got your attention, though, maybe I should discuss the utter ridiculousness of things portrayed in
#TheResident pilot and the following episodes.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @adandersen
Feel free to be a troll. Everything is documented. The legal standard for TV is if it happened just one time, you can show it. Apparently you don't watch medical shows. "House" was nuts. He was an internist who did brain surgery. But it was terrific.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aholdenj @adandersen
I did not like "House" much and rarely watched it after the first season. Bad example. Also "happened once" does not equal "is the norm."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gorskon @adandersen
I did not claim the norm, this is a drama on television not NEMJ. The STANDARD FOR US is, if it happened once. You say you are for "science based medicine" but you won't read an article that refutes your belief. Some scientist. Typical, actually.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can’t have it both ways by saying you’re science-based and then saying you’re ‘not NEJM’ and it only has to be once to be on TV. And that’s journalism you posted, not research. Can we be better? Yes, but on the front line we already work to be better, constantly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're wasting your time, sadly. She bought into lies posted about me by Mike Adams and then blocked me. She's down the conspiracy path too far.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.