No one here is talking about rubbing apples up their ass, Don Jennings. This is what we are talking about, in case you want to read up on it:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=sodium+bicarbonate+cancer …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, I agree, it really seems simple. No evidence means there is no evidence. It does not mean it does not work. It just means there is no evidence. As you say, it is actually very simple.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I agree no evidence often can be a good indication. However, not always. After all, if it was, what would be the point of researching new cancer treatments?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larshaakon @donjx and
But what if a new treatment was studied, and NO EVIDENCE appeared?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Then it is a poorly run study. Or perhaps lack of reporting from the study. Gotta go to bed now. Good night.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larshaakon @donjx and
Read up a little bit on science. Most studies actually don't find what you want. If every study not "poorly designed" told me what I or the researchers wanted to hear, I wouldn't like science very much. You can want baking soda to work. If there's no evidence that it does...
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MTL613 @larshaakon and
He's a true believer, or at least he's really, really wants to believe. Arguing with him is like trying to nail Jello to the wall.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, I am a true believer in scientific rigour. I wish you would join us.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Now you're just getting childish. But thank you for helping to validate my observations. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.