Not exactly. My issue was with a physicist who declared a cell phone-cancer link "impossible" on physical grounds alone based on his Cancer Biology 101 view of cancer that chemical bonds MUST be broken to produce mutations that initiate cancer. That's simplistic. 1/https://twitter.com/c0nc0rdance/status/959546809327681536 …
-
-
However, that was years ago. While I still stand by my assessment of the relative implausibility (but not absolute impossibility) of mechanisms for a cell phone-cancer link, I'm becoming more and more convinced that there won't ever be evidence to change my mind 4/
Show this thread -
I base this conclusion on how, even after advocates have tried for 10-15 years to show an epidemiological link, no link has yet been found. All the evidence presented in favor of such a link remains very poor quality and/or biased. /end
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.