This applies to *all* pundits regardless of topic or profession, actually. An interesting (I hope) anecdote follows. 1/ https://www.mcgill.ca/science/outreach/archived-science-talks/webcasts/trottier-symposium/2010 …https://twitter.com/JHowardBrainMD/status/1425786396153978882 …
-
-
Rather, they find themselves invited on these shows because of their contrarian positions, with more invitations the better known they become. As they become better known, it gets harder and harder for them to admit that they might have been wrong. 10/
Show this thread -
What if news actually rewarded more nuanced takes? What if it wasn't about the conflict or the "interesting" or "radical" contrarian take on
#COVID19? Where would we be now? 11/11Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.