Note the weasel wording/buzz words (“not opposed to #covidvaccines IN GENERAL”) that gives away the game. FLCCC is *clearly* antivax. It’s quite obvious from this statement. If this statement were the only thing I knew about FLCCC, I’d say, “Yep, they’re *definitely* antivax.” 1/https://twitter.com/grahamwalker/status/1425544343947931650 …
-
-
Forgot to mention: Another obvious “tell” in
@Covid19Critical’s statement is the conspicuous lack of a clear statement that current#covidvaccines are safe and effective. This sort of omission is also a classic page from the antivax playbook going way back. 10/10Show this thread -
Upon further thought, I’m starting to conclude that
@Covid19Critical might not be strongly antivax, but it has at least some antivax leaders, and it knows its audience, which is definitely antivax. Pandering or antivax? I suspect now it’s a little of both. 11/11Show this thread -
Also, claiming that its science is being “suppressed” in favor of vaccines works so much better as a sales pitch and a conspiracy theory if the vaccines are *also* portrayed as ineffective/dangerous/etc. 12/12
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
With the FLCCC's permission I'm including statements from them:
On Vaccines
The FLCCC Alliance is NOT opposed to COVID-19 vaccinations in general, and furthermore, supports policies such as mask wearing and social distancing to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 1/3