No one is ignoring adverse reactions. Quite the contrary. Informed consent is being given, contrary to the narrative being pushed by contrarians and antivaxxers. https://twitter.com/millertcb/status/1420884464880676865 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @gorskon
You want people to get the jab? Then let’s have open dialogue. That’s what gets us there, not censorship. Let’s get this done.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @millertcb
Define what you mean by "open dialogue," because to me the dialogue seems very open to me, to the point where disinformation is discussed as freely (or more so) than science-based information about
#CovidVaccine.1 reply 4 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
Not every doctor that has a concern with the vaccine is a quack. They are not allowed however to be interviewed on social media, or TV. I think this creates a sense of distrust with much of the public.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @millertcb
I’ve yet to see a nonquack doctor with a “concern” about the vaccine banned from social media. In fact, getting accounts of real quacks suspended is quite difficult. Perhaps you can provide examples.
1 reply 0 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @gorskon
Serious question: The odds of a healthy person under 65 getting seriously ill, or death (from COVID)is extremely low. So why is this group needing to be vaxed with the risk factor associated with the vaccine? Thank you
30 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @millertcb
Define “very low.” Serious question. What, to you, are “extremely low” odds?
2 replies 0 retweets 53 likes
Also, I can’t help but point out that you didn’t answer my question. Please provide examples of nonquacks whose social media accounts were suspended for expressing concerns about #CovidVaccine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.