Yes, there are endless terrible trials, but we've had 18 months. WE COULD'VE RUN GOOD TRIALS We didn't. That is woeful, and frankly inadequate
-
-
Yes, it's possible that
#ivermectin might have a therapeutic benefit vs.#COVID19, but, again, its low prior plausibility plus equivocal and low quality clinical trials *strongly* suggest that it probably does not. -
My prediction for
#ivermectin is thus the same as it was for#HydroxyChloroquine a year ago. It's highly unlikely that it works against#COVID19. However, if a therapeutic effect is seen in large randomized trials, it will almost certainly be weak, far less than a "miracle cure."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree with that, we may slightly disagree on the details but I don't even have a relevant education so I have a limited ability to judge it. We both agree we can't study things just because some weak studies report an effect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.