This is a strange defense given what else Jesse has gotten completely wrong in responding to critics of Shrier.
-
-
Replying to @etotheipie @HelloLeshell and
Alexander—CRT Opponents Oppose Academic Freedom Retweeted Merkin Muffley
Or, I guess, critics of other GC people. My memory’s shit trying to remember the relevant people from like a week ago. But this is pretty straightforwardly inaccurate.https://twitter.com/MerkinMuffley5/status/1414338330368647172 …
Alexander—CRT Opponents Oppose Academic Freedom added,
Merkin Muffley @MerkinMuffley5Seriously this is wild. Novella and Gorski cite evidence on adult transition outcomes in direct response to Hall's explicit claim about adult transition outcomes. The bulk of this article is dedicated to demanding that someone just make up more reasonable positions for Hall. pic.twitter.com/QxyTmhf7jNShow this thread2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @etotheipie @gorskon and
“Words matter” is not a strange defense. Someone getting things wrong doesn’t relieve the responsibility of publishers to get it right. It’s not a game. There aren’t points for dunking back and forth. If we’re not holding the “experts” accountable - who will?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @HelloLeshell @gorskon and
Not Singal, which is the point. I can’t help but shield my eye from the backdrop to this when you say that, his glaringly shameful defense of the sexologist “experts” who were engaging in conversion therapy for decades against gay and GNC children.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @etotheipie @gorskon and
No, you've changed the point. My point always has been that SBM should get it right. I should have left Jesse out of it because then he becomes the target. What he got wrong, doesn't change what he got right.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HelloLeshell @etotheipie and
We corrected the errors. However, correcting those quote errors doesn't mean that we don't recognize what Singal is doing. We can do both. And with that my bedtime approaches.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @HelloLeshell and
What Singal is doing, in the view of disinterested observers, is called "winning the argument by a mile". I'd never heard of SBM before this kerfuffle, but now I know it's an unreliable source of information because it can be pressured by a small but vocal group of ideologues.
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @AndrewHammel1 @gorskon and
Signal is an entertainer, performing for his audience. He is neither a credible journalist nor scientist. Be careful who you are trusting so readily
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @unbrokencocoon @gorskon and
I've read his work, probably unlike you; he is very much a journalist and understands the science. The ration of corrections he's provoked (with teeth-gnashing) compared to the ones he's made (gladly) is about 10:1. This is why nobody from the "other" side will debate him.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AndrewHammel1 @unbrokencocoon and
That's a funny thing to say about a guy who has so little substantive critique that he has to nitpick about "woke gender ideology" versus "gender ideology"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Or "radical trans ideology" versus "radical gender ideology"/"extreme gender ideology." We corrected all because it was the right thing to do, but we are not fooled by Singal any more. (We were at first, admittedly.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.