I wish this were true; many times it leads to citations of Andrew Wakefield and other papers by antivax "scientists" and physicians.
https://twitter.com/MarcusBlimi/status/1417690073722724355 …
-
-
Recently retracted articles, cited both for their flawed conclusions and meta-proposition that “They won't allow anything that challenge The Narrative.” But yes, result is the same: they purport to have evidence, then you're just arguing the junk they Gish galloped.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.