I mean, these are people who should know better, a disturbing number of them scientists and doctors.
-
-
Show this thread
-
They also don't seem to understand that meta-analysis, but its very nature, includes a number of judgment calls in deciding which studies to include and ranking their rigor (i.e., risk of bias). Methods matter. A lot.
Show this thread -
Oh, gee. In this case, all this and blatant misogyny too.https://twitter.com/mjaeckel/status/1416762251541946370 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I had hoped this particular individual knew as much because she’s employed as a data scientist. A clear example of the damage caused by Weinstein’s disinformation campaign.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Garbage in, garbage out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although as far as the second tweet is concerned, that's generally correct, with the caveat that "generally" is doing a ton of work there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out This is a limitation I try to teach. We need to critically appraise the methodology of a SRMA. Also, look at the included studies. These can threaten the validity and conclusions of a meta-analysis.pic.twitter.com/NMHQH24yrj
-
There are critical appraisal tools available to help us probe studies including SRMAs.https://www.thesgem.com/2014/03/make-it-so-beem-appraisal-tools/ …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@readwiseio save thread -
First public save of this thread!
Readwise users: Like this reply to save gorskon's thread to your account without cluttering their replies
Stats:
• 2 total saves of gorskon's threads (ranked #6230)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.