I also wonder if there are some tipping points. Institutions like academia have strong traditions of open debate, which helps them to be self-critical. But if you go from e.g. 80% of members preferring one political party to 95%, those traditions may get swamped by partisanship.
-
-
You see, according to Nate's of this world, this teaching of "Evolution" is hyper partisan. Why do 97% of scientists believe in "Climate change"?
-
I also laugh at the thought that >80% of academic physicians are Democrats.



- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nate is a numbers guy even if he has to make up the numbers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.