Correct. Even though there is some plausibility for #LabLeak, the arguments being made for #LabLeakTheory currently bear all of the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory.https://twitter.com/thebirdmaniac/status/1404550561232531471 …
-
-
As for the other possibility, that
#SARSCoV2 was a#LabLeak is a natural#coronavirus stored at Wuhan, that's only somewhat more plausible than an engineered virus and MUCH less likely than a natural zoonotic origin. -
OF a natural coronavirus.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
a. Probably true about proponents, but there's a very serious contingent that considers a breach possible (without being necessary) b. I'm not betting money on anyone's molecular bio. But we ought to be able to trust the analysis behind the Proximal Origins paper;
-
I haven't seen a digestible connecting of the dots, have you?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I follow both sides of this debate. What
@gorskon says here is simply not accurate. There are people who insist covid was "engineered" but they're a minority of the Lab Leak faction. -
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sttawman.
@Ayjchan and@R_H_Ebright have consistently posited that both natural and lab-related origins are plausible and merit further investigation. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
They are not the "minority" that I encounter. In fact, even the advocates of