Why don't you point out where he's wrong in his analysis.
-
-
Replying to @GrumFromNorwich @ENirenberg
1/2 He sounds like he knows what he's talking about, but does not have the experience, expertise or education of Geer Vanden Bossche. This is an example of where having just enough knowledge of a subject matter is a dangerous thing. He also very pro-vax and is on a mission
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Izzzywith3zees @ENirenberg
That's more or less an argument from authority rather than answer the question.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @GrumFromNorwich @ENirenberg
Perhaps
@ENirenberg can write another "hit piece" then:https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Izzzywith3zees @ENirenberg
I see it's got Yeadon's name at the bottom.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Michael Yeadon is no better. He's been a crank for a while now.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/it-was-inevitable-that-antivaxxers-would-claim-that-covid-19-vaccines-make-females-infertile/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Care to explain to everyone, what your connection to James Randi is
@gorkson? I'll wait. This should be good.pic.twitter.com/UfIMUqH6r3
12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Izzzywith3zees @gorskon and
Wait. You think that being connected to Randi is a *bad* thing? WTF is wrong with you?
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Well, the company you keep, you know? https://unmaskingorac.blogspot.com/
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It’s more Mike Adams smears.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @Juvenalky and
Mike Adams *is* a smear. I'll let you guess what color.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.