This conflation is a transparent ploy to make make it seem as though the conclusions of a crank faculty member carry the full endorsement of his university. It’s an exaggerated appeal to authority. 2/2
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Link to story?
-
WSJ (where else?)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, you mean it is *only* Dr Makary urging people not to vaccinate kids rather than Johns Hopkins university & its entire school of public health? That’s a critical distinction!pic.twitter.com/fQACNnkMM5
-
Supposedly the UK is hypervigilant about testing youth and identifying cases. 1 in 50 cases are being hospitalized now in kids.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Stanford
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ditto Dr. Genevieve Briand’s presentation, "COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data", claiming that, "Total [2020] death numbers are not above normal death numbers." It was published in a student newsletter, yet is usually cited by cranks as a "Johns Hopkins study".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are several Stanford faculty whose statements on Covid often contradict university guidelines so egregiously that I could be kicked out of graduate student housing if I followed the advice they've been giving on Fox News.https://twitter.com/malar0ne/status/1383453355167547400?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read his book, it's very self serving completely full of himself. But I have trouble not finishing a book I started, so I read the entire thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
UNM concluded that I agree with you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.