In February, Facebook began suppressing all content promoting the idea that COVID-19 had manmade origins. (Last week, the company reversed course.) I think this says a great deal about the misguided campaign against online "misinformation. (1)https://reason.com/2021/06/04/lab-leak-misinformation-media-fauci-covid-19/ …
This is, of course, nothing more than propaganda, a premature unjustified claim of false vindication. NOTHING has changed in terms of evidence for #LabLeak in 15 months. If anything, the evidence for a natural origin for #SARSCoV2 has grown stronger.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-origin-of-sars-cov-2-revisited/ …
-
-
Basically, the newfound "plausibility" of
#LabLeak is due primarily to ideologues and bad faith actors ginning up the narrative to build political pressure. There's no new evidence that's in the least bit compelling for it. -
You’ve missed the point entirely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Lab leak" and man made are not necessarily equivalent. If USAMRIID had a lab leak of smallpox, it would be a leak of a naturally occurring virus. The objection was always to a "bio-weapon", man made virus. My understanding is there is no evidence it's man made, even now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.