When @aetiology @gorskon attack straw men & turn off tweet replies, it suggests they lack confidence in their convictions. The question is simple: Is a #lableak plausible? Or is it a “debunked” “conspiracy theory,” as it was described by the media in 2020?https://twitter.com/htown_Joe/status/1400598827015589890 …
-
Show this thread
-
What
@aetiology said. Please listen to her. When people limit who can comment or reply to statements, it suggests they may have reasons to do so.@Twitter allowed us to limit replies to followers, people tagged, or no one. https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/11/twitter-now-lets-everyone-limit-replies-to-their-tweets/ … Why? Networked abuse campaigns1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @digiphile @aetiology and
Threats can be reported and Twitter will take action; replies can be ignored. Wanting to be able to speak your mind without hearing opposing arguments is not an admirable trait, no matter the reason. If someone turns off replies, they open themselves up to justified criticism.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @htown_Joe @digiphile and
"Twitter will take action"? What planet are you from? No, seriously, I haven't seen a statement that clueless, even on this hell site, in quite a while.


pic.twitter.com/hvAW2r3pLs1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gorskon
I’ve seen Twitter take action against accounts who threatened me. I don’t know how often it happens. Either way, I still find it strange you won’t answer my question about plausibility. And since you’re not interested in doing so, I’m happy to call it a night, if you want.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
To be honest, right now I don't even remember what your question was, and, at this point, having seen your interaction with @aetiology and others, I don't really care what it was. Call it a night it is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.