When @aetiology @gorskon attack straw men & turn off tweet replies, it suggests they lack confidence in their convictions. The question is simple: Is a #lableak plausible? Or is it a “debunked” “conspiracy theory,” as it was described by the media in 2020?https://twitter.com/htown_Joe/status/1400598827015589890 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @htown_Joe @gorskon
I turned off replies--for perhaps the second time ever--because I just don't need the harassment over science from people who clearly don't understand the issues but were sent by trolls with large followings. How many death and rape comments do you get daily?
4 replies 3 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @aetiology @htown_Joe
Yep. It couldn’t *possibly* occur to Joe that someone might have valid reasons not to want to engage.
2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @aetiology
Who is dishing out “abuse” to whom now? Talking down doesn’t make you correct. It only causes others to view your points with suspicion. It’s also *possible* that one who refuses to see replies simply prefers to live in a bubble in which they are not exposed to contrary views.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"Abuse"? I used mild sarcasm to make my point. If you're that sensitive, maybe this place isn't for you. Seriously, dude. Do you know how self-righteously obnoxious you sound?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.