When @aetiology @gorskon attack straw men & turn off tweet replies, it suggests they lack confidence in their convictions. The question is simple: Is a #lableak plausible? Or is it a “debunked” “conspiracy theory,” as it was described by the media in 2020?https://twitter.com/htown_Joe/status/1400598827015589890 …
-
-
But, yeah. Even I can’t really understand. I might get the odd death threat every now and then, but I don’t endure the sorts of abuse and sexual threats that women like
@aetiology routinely do. -
I’ve said it before and will say it again. I don’t know if I could handle social media if I were female or a person of color, given the abuse level they tolerate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
There are “sides”? I wasn’t aware there were “sides” in science. I’m not on one. I tweeted your article, called it “compelling,” and explicitly adjusted my own % guesstimate. I’m interested in making sure the media doesn’t engage in groupthink, and knowing the best answer I can.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.