Not exactly. Scientists have always conceded that #lableak was *possible.* The problem is, it was never very plausible compared to a natural origin for #SARSCoV2. It tended to be dismissed for other reasons, too.https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1399708106989441027 …
-
-
Hi! here is your unroll: Not exactly. Scientists have always conceded that
#lableak was… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1399822058771595264.html … Talk to you soon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
you're right - many claims of
#lableak are ludicrous, unscientific, conspiratorial. but some are not. we agree on those that are bogus. can we focus on those that aren't? & why is a lableak so implausible, given history? they've not been all that rare. humans err. it's a featureThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.