Not exactly. Scientists have always conceded that #lableak was *possible.* The problem is, it was never very plausible compared to a natural origin for #SARSCoV2. It tended to be dismissed for other reasons, too.https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1399708106989441027 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would it need a massive cover-up?
-
With the second version (natural virus studies in lab and leaked) I don't seem how a massive cover-up is needed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
you've said serology data from individuals claimed to have come down with flu/COVID-19 symptoms in Aug 2019 show it was not COVID. that would indeed be strong evidence. where are those data? if it's just a claim by China, it's suspect.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and in the same time periodhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_laboratory_biosecurity_incidents …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.