I wrote this back in March after the @WHO report was published. As the #LabLeak hypothesis hits headlines again, it offers some context about why it can’t be dismissed out of hand:https://incision.substack.com/p/whos-report-is-it-anyway-the-murky …
-
-
Replying to @AbdulElSayed @WHO
That's a disappointing article. Nothing has changed, evidence-wise, about
#lableak in a year.#LabLeakTheory is no more plausible today than it was in March 2020, increased chatter and@POTUS's order notwithstanding. It's *possible*, but quite unlikely.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-origin-of-sars-cov-2-revisited/ …3 replies 2 retweets 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @JonathanSwayze @AbdulElSayed and
So true. In particular I love the evidence pointed to "proof" that #SARSCoV2 could not have arisen naturally. It nearly always proves nothing of the sort and is riddled with ignorance of molecular biology, genetics, virology, and evolution.
8:44 AM - 31 May 2021
0 replies
4 retweets
19 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.