Precisely! The only thing that’s maybe changed just a *little* bit is emphasis. The lab leak hypothesis is still considered highly unlikely, but maybe slightly less so. Maybe. Either way, scientists have acknowledged it as a possibility from the beginning.https://twitter.com/steinkobbe/status/1397329143394676737 …
-
-
Right, that's what I was trying to say. It's weird to me people are pretending they weren't pushing the truly conspiratorial stuff
-
Depends on the person because some of us haven't changed our stance at all in over a year.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"Bioweapon is a ridiculous and far-fetched theory? Okay, i'll change my strategy then!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if it's a weapon, just not a Chinese one? Do we know Putin's version of USAAMRID isn't doing this kind of research?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You do know bioweapon refers to how a thing is used not how it was created?pic.twitter.com/g2Y2tyDDst
-
and when I say "refers to" I mean it's the literal definition.pic.twitter.com/ec6dycMgty
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Those promoting the possible lab leak hypothesis are giving massive cover to those spreading the bioweapon lab leak hypothesis. On twitter, they are both simply "the lab leak hypothesis" and people defending one are effectively defending both
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.