“Medical marijuana” is and has always been mostly a marketing term to lead the way to legalization for recreational use. The evidence base supporting just weed (as opposed to pharmaceutically purified cannibinoids) to treat anything has always been highly underwhelming.https://twitter.com/SBMPediatrics/status/1397144459889029120 …
-
-
Basically, as I wrote 7 years ago, medical marijuana is the new herbalism. 8/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-marijuana-as-the-new-herbalism-part-1-the-politics-of-weed-versus-science/ …
Show this thread -
There is a way to show that medical marijuana can be science-based medicine, but I've yet to see very much of it in the arguments of advocates. 9/9https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-marijuana-as-the-new-herbalism-part-5-turning-herbalism-into-science-based-medicine/ …
Show this thread -
Forgot to add: But I have, however, endured a lot of "pharma shill gambit" attacks for having the temerity to suggest that the emperor has no clothes when it comes to medical marijuana. (Well, mostly. Maybe the emperor is wearing just a thong).
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We disagree on recreational. The harms of legalizing commercial sales of recreational marijuana are too high. Increase public health and safety risks so that Big MJ moguls can line their pockets $$$$? I don't get it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. I want nothing to do with prescribing some specific amount for some specific disorder, based on no evidence, as if there were definitive guidelines for curing disease with cannabis. I’m very happy people can just go get their own weed now in
. Leave me out of it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.