The thing is, you don’t know this. It’s unfalsifiable. But if masks have prevented even a few cases, and those cases resulted in death, they have probably been worth it. This narrative arc you’re on is very troubling.
-
-
Replying to @AlastairMcA30 @sdbaral
Very troubling indeed. They're all sounding more and more like
#COVID19 conspiracy theorists. No doubt that characterization offends, but I have a simple answer to them: Don't want to be compared to a crank? Stop sounding like one and using the same talking points.6 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I didn’t call him a crank. I said he’s sounding more and more like one. Seehttps://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccine-children-under-an-emergency-use-authorization/ …
0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But that's not really what he said. He said that he bets that outdoor masking hasn't averted a single
#COVID19 fatality, which is probably wrong but unfalsifiable. That's the sort of statement that has drifted from the reasonable to sounding very crank-like, with its certainty.0 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, but he made a near-absolute statement. No one would have had a problem with it if he had said that he thought masking outdoors probably doesn't do a lot of good. Instead, he said that he doubted that it had averted even a single
#COVID19 death.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You seem very defensive of him for some reason, to the point of defending him for having made a rather overblown statement. One wonders why, one does...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.